Legal Firm Secures $300,000 Recovery in Underinsured Motorist Case Following T-Bone Collision
TL;DR
Piscitelli Law Firm secured a $300,000 recovery by litigating against a lowball $70,000 offer, demonstrating how aggressive legal action maximizes compensation from underinsured motorist coverage.
The firm recovered $300,000 by filing a $275,000 lawsuit after a $25,000 setoff from the at-fault driver's minimum coverage, overcoming an initial $70,000 UIM offer.
This $300,000 recovery for a 78-year-old injured in a T-bone collision ensures proper compensation for radial tunnel syndrome, protecting vulnerable individuals from underinsured drivers.
Radial tunnel syndrome, a painful nerve compression causing grip weakness, was among injuries in this 50 mph T-bone collision case that secured $300,000 through UIM coverage.
Found this article helpful?
Share it with your network and spread the knowledge!
The Piscitelli Law Firm secured a $300,000 total recovery for a 78-year-old individual who sustained injuries in a 50 mph T-bone collision. After the driver responsible for the accident provided Ohio's minimum coverage of $25,000, the firm sought to recover the client's $300,000 underinsured motorist coverage. The injuries sustained by the client included resolved soft-tissue trauma and radial tunnel syndrome, a painful condition caused by compression of the radial nerve in the upper forearm that leads to discomfort, weakened grip, and pain during rotation.
The UIM insurance provider initially presented an offer of $70,000. In response, the firm filed a lawsuit for $275,000, which represented the UIM limit minus the $25,000 setoff. After several months of legal proceedings, the insurer disbursed the full $275,000, culminating in a total recovery of $300,000. Frank Piscitelli, Jr. stated that UIM coverage is designed to provide compensation when the at-fault driver is underinsured. He explained that when the insurance company undervalued the client's claim, the firm pursued litigation and successfully obtained the full policy benefits.
This case demonstrates the critical role underinsured motorist coverage plays in protecting individuals when accidents involve drivers carrying only minimum insurance requirements. The $275,000 difference between the initial offer and final settlement underscores how insurance companies may initially undervalue claims, necessitating legal action to secure appropriate compensation. The successful recovery highlights the importance of understanding policy limits and pursuing full benefits when injuries warrant compensation beyond what at-fault drivers can provide.
The firm's approach to this case, detailed at https://getfrankgetjustice.com/result/300000-dollar-recovery-in-underinsured-motorist-case/, illustrates the legal process involved in UIM claims. The outcome serves as a reminder that state minimum insurance requirements often prove inadequate for serious accidents, making supplemental UIM coverage essential for comprehensive financial protection. This recovery emphasizes that policyholders should not accept initial settlement offers that fail to account for the full extent of their injuries and losses.
Curated from Press Services
